Stock Data Analysis

JULY 18, 2018

Stock Data Analysis with Python (Second Edition)

Introduction

This is a lecture for MATH 4100/CS 5160: Introduction to Data Science, offered at the University of Utah, introducing time series data analysis applied to finance. This is also an update to my earlier blog posts on the same topic (this one combining them together). I strongly advise referring to this blog post instead of the previous ones (which I am not altering for the sake of preserving a record). The code should work as of July 7th, 2018. (And sorry for some of the formatting; WordPress.com’s free version doesn’t play nice with code or tables.)

Advanced mathematics and statistics have been present in finance for some time. Prior to the 1980s, banking and finance were well-known for being “boring”; investment banking was distinct from commercial banking and the primary role of the industry was handling “simple” (at least in comparison to today) financial instruments, such as loans. Deregulation under the Regan administration, coupled with an influx of mathematical talent, transformed the industry from the “boring” business of banking to what it is today, and since then, finance has joined the other sciences as a motivation for mathematical research and advancement. For example one of the biggest recent achievements of mathematics was the derivation of the Black-Scholes formula, which facilitated the pricing of stock options (a contract giving the holder the right to purchase or sell a stock at a particular price to the issuer of the option). That said, bad statistical models, including the Black-Scholes formula, hold part of the blame for the 2008 financial crisis.

In recent years, computer science has joined advanced mathematics in revolutionizing finance and trading, the practice of buying and selling of financial assets for the purpose of making a profit. In recent years, trading has become dominated by computers; algorithms are responsible for making rapid split-second trading decisions faster than humans could make (so rapidly, the speed at which light travels is a limitation when designing systems). Additionally, machine learning and data mining techniques are growing in popularity in the financial sector, and likely will continue to do so. For example, high-frequency trading (HFT) is a branch of algorithmic trading where computers make thousands of trades in short periods of time, engaging in complex strategies such as statistical arbitrage and market making. While algorithms may outperform humans, the technology is still new and playing an increasing role in a famously turbulent, high-stakes arena. HFT was responsible for phenomena such as the 2010 flash crash and a 2013 flash crash prompted by a hacked Associated Press tweet about an attack on the White House.

This lecture, however, will not be about how to crash the stock market with bad mathematical models or trading algorithms. Instead, I intend to provide you with basic tools for handling and analyzing stock market data with Python. We will be using stock data as a first exposure to time series data, which is data considered dependent on the time it was observed (other examples of time series include temperature data, demand for energy on a power grid, Internet server load, and many, many others). I will also discuss moving averages, how to construct trading strategies using moving averages, how to formulate exit strategies upon entering a position, and how to evaluate a strategy with backtesting.

DISCLAIMER: THIS IS NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE!!! Furthermore, I have ZERO experience as a trader (a lot of this knowledge comes from a one-semester course on stock trading I took at Salt Lake Community College)! This is purely introductory knowledge, not enough to make a living trading stocks. People can and do lose money trading stocks, and you do so at your own risk!

Preliminaries

I will be using two packages, quandl and pandas_datareader, which are not installed with Anaconda if you are using it. To install these packages, run the following at the appropriate command prompt:

conda install quandl
conda install pandas-datareader

Getting and Visualizing Stock Data

Getting Data from Quandl

Before we analyze stock data, we need to get it into some workable format. Stock data can be obtained from Yahoo! Finance, Google Finance, or a number of other sources. These days I recommend getting data from Quandl, a provider of community-maintained financial and economic data. (Yahoo! Finance used to be the go-to source for good quality stock data, but the API was discontinued in 2017 and reliable data can no longer be obtained: see this question/answer on StackExchange for more details.)

By default the get() function in quandl will return a pandas DataFrame containing the fetched data.

import pandas as pd
import quandl
import datetime

# We will look at stock prices over the past year, starting at January 1, 2016
start = datetime.datetime(2016,1,1)
end = datetime.date.today()

# Let's get Apple stock data; Apple's ticker symbol is AAPL
# First argument is the series we want, second is the source ("yahoo" for Yahoo! Finance), third is the start date, fourth is the end date
s = "AAPL"
apple = quandl.get("WIKI/" + s, start_date=start, end_date=end)

type(apple)

pandas.core.frame.DataFrame

apple.head()

	Open	High	Low	Close	Volume
Date
2016-01-04	102.61	105.368	102.00	105.35	67649387.0
2016-01-05	105.75	105.850	102.41	102.71	55790992.0
2016-01-06	100.56	102.370	99.87	100.70	68457388.0
2016-01-07	98.68	100.130	96.43	96.45	81094428.0
2016-01-08	98.55	99.110	96.76	96.96	70798016.0

Ex-Dividend	Split Ratio	Adj. Open	Adj. High	Adj. Low	Adj. Close	Adj. Volume
0.0	1.0	99.136516	101.801154	98.547165	101.783763	67649387.0
0.0	1.0	102.170223	102.266838	98.943286	99.233131	55790992.0
0.0	1.0	97.155911	98.904640	96.489269	97.291172	68457388.0
0.0	1.0	95.339552	96.740467	93.165717	93.185040	81094428.0
0.0	1.0	95.213952	95.754996	93.484546	93.677776	70798016.0

Let’s briefly discuss this. Open is the price of the stock at the beginning of the trading day (it need not be the closing price of the previous trading day), high is the highest price of the stock on that trading day, low the lowest price of the stock on that trading day, and close the price of the stock at closing time. Volume indicates how many stocks were traded. Adjusted prices (such as the adjusted close) is the price of the stock that adjusts the price for corporate actions. While stock prices are considered to be set mostly by traders, stock splits (when the company makes each extant stock worth two and halves the price) and dividends (payout of company profits per share) also affect the price of a stock and should be accounted for.

Visualizing Stock Data

Now that we have stock data we would like to visualize it. I first demonstrate how to do so using the matplotlib package. Notice that the apple DataFrame object has a convenience method, plot(), which makes creating plots easier.

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt   # Import matplotlib
# This line is necessary for the plot to appear in a Jupyter notebook
%matplotlib inline
# Control the default size of figures in this Jupyter notebook
%pylab inline
pylab.rcParams['figure.figsize'] = (15, 9)   # Change the size of plots

apple["Adj. Close"].plot(grid = True) # Plot the adjusted closing price of AAPL

Populating the interactive namespace from numpy and matplotlib

png

A linechart is fine, but there are at least four variables involved for each date (open, high, low, and close), and we would like to have some visual way to see all four variables that does not require plotting four separate lines. Financial data is often plotted with a Japanese candlestick plot, so named because it was first created by 18th century Japanese rice traders. Such a chart can be created with matplotlib, though it requires considerable effort.

I have made a function you are welcome to use to more easily create candlestick charts from pandas data frames, and use it to plot our stock data. (Code is based off this example, and you can read the documentation for the functions involved here.)

from matplotlib.dates import DateFormatter, WeekdayLocator,\
    DayLocator, MONDAY
from mpl_finance import candlestick_ohlc

def pandas_candlestick_ohlc(dat, stick = "day", adj = False, otherseries = None):
    """
    :param dat: pandas DataFrame object with datetime64 index, and float columns "Open", "High", "Low", and "Close", likely created via DataReader from "yahoo"
    :param stick: A string or number indicating the period of time covered by a single candlestick. Valid string inputs include "day", "week", "month", and "year", ("day" default), and any numeric input indicates the number of trading days included in a period
    :param adj: A boolean indicating whether to use adjusted prices
    :param otherseries: An iterable that will be coerced into a list, containing the columns of dat that hold other series to be plotted as lines

    This will show a Japanese candlestick plot for stock data stored in dat, also plotting other series if passed.
    """
    mondays = WeekdayLocator(MONDAY)        # major ticks on the mondays
    alldays = DayLocator()              # minor ticks on the days
    dayFormatter = DateFormatter('%d')      # e.g., 12

    # Create a new DataFrame which includes OHLC data for each period specified by stick input
    fields = ["Open", "High", "Low", "Close"]
    if adj:
        fields = ["Adj. " + s for s in fields]
    transdat = dat.loc[:,fields]
    transdat.columns = pd.Index(["Open", "High", "Low", "Close"])
    if (type(stick) == str):
        if stick == "day":
            plotdat = transdat
            stick = 1 # Used for plotting
        elif stick in ["week", "month", "year"]:
            if stick == "week":
                transdat["week"] = pd.to_datetime(transdat.index).map(lambda x: x.isocalendar()[1]) # Identify weeks
            elif stick == "month":
                transdat["month"] = pd.to_datetime(transdat.index).map(lambda x: x.month) # Identify months
            transdat["year"] = pd.to_datetime(transdat.index).map(lambda x: x.isocalendar()[0]) # Identify years
            grouped = transdat.groupby(list(set(["year",stick]))) # Group by year and other appropriate variable
            plotdat = pd.DataFrame({"Open": [], "High": [], "Low": [], "Close": []}) # Create empty data frame containing what will be plotted
            for name, group in grouped:
                plotdat = plotdat.append(pd.DataFrame({"Open": group.iloc[0,0],
                                            "High": max(group.High),
                                            "Low": min(group.Low),
                                            "Close": group.iloc[-1,3]},
                                           index = [group.index[0]]))
            if stick == "week": stick = 5
            elif stick == "month": stick = 30
            elif stick == "year": stick = 365

    elif (type(stick) == int and stick >= 1):
        transdat["stick"] = [np.floor(i / stick) for i in range(len(transdat.index))]
        grouped = transdat.groupby("stick")
        plotdat = pd.DataFrame({"Open": [], "High": [], "Low": [], "Close": []}) # Create empty data frame containing what will be plotted
        for name, group in grouped:
            plotdat = plotdat.append(pd.DataFrame({"Open": group.iloc[0,0],
                                        "High": max(group.High),
                                        "Low": min(group.Low),
                                        "Close": group.iloc[-1,3]},
                                       index = [group.index[0]]))

    else:
        raise ValueError('Valid inputs to argument "stick" include the strings "day", "week", "month", "year", or a positive integer')


    # Set plot parameters, including the axis object ax used for plotting
    fig, ax = plt.subplots()
    fig.subplots_adjust(bottom=0.2)
    if plotdat.index[-1] - plotdat.index[0] < pd.Timedelta('730 days'):
        weekFormatter = DateFormatter('%b %d')  # e.g., Jan 12
        ax.xaxis.set_major_locator(mondays)
        ax.xaxis.set_minor_locator(alldays)
    else:
        weekFormatter = DateFormatter('%b %d, %Y')
    ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(weekFormatter)

    ax.grid(True)

    # Create the candelstick chart
    candlestick_ohlc(ax, list(zip(list(date2num(plotdat.index.tolist())), plotdat["Open"].tolist(), plotdat["High"].tolist(),
                      plotdat["Low"].tolist(), plotdat["Close"].tolist())),
                      colorup = "black", colordown = "red", width = stick * .4)

    # Plot other series (such as moving averages) as lines
    if otherseries != None:
        if type(otherseries) != list:
            otherseries = [otherseries]
        dat.loc[:,otherseries].plot(ax = ax, lw = 1.3, grid = True)

    ax.xaxis_date()
    ax.autoscale_view()
    plt.setp(plt.gca().get_xticklabels(), rotation=45, horizontalalignment='right')

    plt.show()

pandas_candlestick_ohlc(apple, adj=True, stick="month")

png

With a candlestick chart, a black candlestick indicates a day where the closing price was higher than the open (a gain), while a red candlestick indicates a day where the open was higher than the close (a loss). The wicks indicate the high and the low, and the body the open and close (hue is used to determine which end of the body is the open and which the close). Candlestick charts are popular in finance and some strategies in technical analysis use them to make trading decisions, depending on the shape, color, and position of the candles. I will not cover such strategies today.

We may wish to plot multiple financial instruments together; we may want to compare stocks, compare them to the market, or look at other securities such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Later, we will also want to see how to plot a financial instrument against some indicator, like a moving average. For this you would rather use a line chart than a candlestick chart. (How would you plot multiple candlestick charts on top of one another without cluttering the chart?)

Below, I get stock data for some other tech companies and plot their adjusted close together.

microsoft, google = (quandl.get("WIKI/" + s, start_date=start, end_date=end) for s in ["MSFT", "GOOG"])

# Below I create a DataFrame consisting of the adjusted closing price of these stocks, first by making a list of these objects and using the join method
stocks = pd.DataFrame({"AAPL": apple["Adj. Close"],
                      "MSFT": microsoft["Adj. Close"],
                      "GOOG": google["Adj. Close"]})

stocks.head()

	AAPL	GOOG	MSFT
Date
2016-01-04	101.783763	741.84	52.181598
2016-01-05	99.233131	742.58	52.419653
2016-01-06	97.291172	743.62	51.467434
2016-01-07	93.185040	726.39	49.677262
2016-01-08	93.677776	714.47	49.829617

stocks.plot(grid = True)

png

What’s wrong with this chart? While absolute price is important (pricy stocks are difficult to purchase, which affects not only their volatility but your ability to trade that stock), when trading, we are more concerned about the relative change of an asset rather than its absolute price. Google’s stocks are much more expensive than Apple’s or Microsoft’s, and this difference makes Apple’s and Microsoft’s stocks appear much less volatile than they truly are (that is, their price appears to not deviate much).

One solution would be to use two different scales when plotting the data; one scale will be used by Apple and Microsoft stocks, and the other by Google.

stocks.plot(secondary_y = ["AAPL", "MSFT"], grid = True)

png

A “better” solution, though, would be to plot the information we actually want: the stock’s returns. This involves transforming the data into something more useful for our purposes. There are multiple transformations we could apply.

One transformation would be to consider the stock’s return since the beginning of the period of interest. In other words, we plot:

\text{return}_{t,0} = \frac{\text{price}_t}{\text{price}_0}

This will require transforming the data in the stocks object, which I do next. Notice that I am using a lambda function, which allows me to pass a small function defined quickly as a parameter to another function or method (you can read more about lambda functions here).

python
# df.apply(arg) will apply the function arg to each column in df, and return a DataFrame with the result
# Recall that lambda x is an anonymous function accepting parameter x; in this case, x will be a pandas Series object
stock_return = stocks.apply(lambda x: x / x[0])
stock_return.head() - 1

	AAPL	GOOG	MSFT
Date
2016-01-04	0.000000	0.000000	0.000000
2016-01-05	-0.025059	0.000998	0.004562
2016-01-06	-0.044139	0.002399	-0.013686
2016-01-07	-0.084480	-0.020827	-0.047993
2016-01-08	-0.079639	-0.036895	-0.045073

stock_return.plot(grid = True).axhline(y = 1, color = "black", lw = 2)

png

This is a much more useful plot. We can now see how profitable each stock was since the beginning of the period. Furthermore, we see that these stocks are highly correlated; they generally move in the same direction, a fact that was difficult to see in the other charts.

Alternatively, we could plot the change of each stock per day. One way to do so would be to plot the percentage increase of a stock when comparing day to day , with the formula:

\text{growth}_t = \frac{\text{price}_{t + 1} - \text{price}_t}{\text{price}_t}

But change could be thought of differently as:

\text{increase}_t = \frac{\text{price}_{t} - \text{price}_{t-1}}{\text{price}_t}

These formulas are not the same and can lead to differing conclusions, but there is another way to model the growth of a stock: with log differences.

\text{change}_t = \log(\text{price}_{t}) - \log(\text{price}_{t - 1})

(Here, is the natural log, and our definition does not depend as strongly on whether we use or .) The advantage of using log differences is that this difference can be interpreted as the percentage change in a stock but does not depend on the denominator of a fraction. Additionally, log differences have a desirable property: the sum of the log differences can be interpreted as the total change (as a percentage) over the period summed (which is not a property of the other formulations; they will overestimate growth). Log differences also more cleanly correspond to how stock prices are modeled in continuous time.

We can obtain and plot the log differences of the data in stocks as follows:

# Let's use NumPy's log function, though math's log function would work just as well
import numpy as np

stock_change = stocks.apply(lambda x: np.log(x) - np.log(x.shift(1))) # shift moves dates back by 1.
stock_change.head()

	AAPL	GOOG	MSFT
Date
2016-01-04	NaN	NaN	NaN
2016-01-05	-0.025379	0.000997	0.004552
2016-01-06	-0.019764	0.001400	-0.018332
2016-01-07	-0.043121	-0.023443	-0.035402
2016-01-08	0.005274	-0.016546	0.003062

stock_change.plot(grid = True).axhline(y = 0, color = "black", lw = 2)

png

Which transformation do you prefer? Looking at returns since the beginning of the period make the overall trend of the securities in question much more apparent. Changes between days, though, are what more advanced methods actually consider when modelling the behavior of a stock. so they should not be ignored.

We often want to compare the performance of stocks to the performance of the overall market. SPY, which is the ticker symbol for the SPDR S&P 500 exchange-traded mutual fund (ETF), is a fund that attempts only to imitate the composition of the S&P 500 stock index, and thus represents the value in “the market.”

SPY data is not available for free from Quandl, so I will get this data from Yahoo! Finance. (I don’t have a choice.)

Below I get data for SPY and compare its performance to the performance of our stocks.

#import pandas_datareader.data as web    # Going to get SPY from Yahoo! (I know I said you shouldn't but I didn't have a choice)
#spyder = web.DataReader("SPY", "yahoo", start, end)    # Didn't work
#spyder = web.DataReader("SPY", "google", start, end)    # Didn't work either
# If all else fails, read from a file, obtained from here: http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/spy/historical
spyderdat = pd.read_csv("/home/curtis/Downloads/HistoricalQuotes.csv")    # Obviously specific to my system; set to
                                                                          # location on your machine
spyderdat = pd.DataFrame(spyderdat.loc[:, ["open", "high", "low", "close", "close"]].iloc[1:].as_matrix(),
                         index=pd.DatetimeIndex(spyderdat.iloc[1:, 0]),
                         columns=["Open", "High", "Low", "Close", "Adj Close"]).sort_index()

spyder = spyderdat.loc[start:end]

stocks = stocks.join(spyder.loc[:, "Adj Close"]).rename(columns={"Adj Close": "SPY"})
stocks.head()

	AAPL	GOOG	MSFT	SPY
Date
2016-01-04	101.783763	741.84	52.181598	201.0192
2016-01-05	99.233131	742.58	52.419653	201.3600
2016-01-06	97.291172	743.62	51.467434	198.8200
2016-01-07	93.185040	726.39	49.677262	194.0500
2016-01-08	93.677776	714.47	49.829617	191.9230

stock_return = stocks.apply(lambda x: x / x[0])
stock_return.plot(grid = True).axhline(y = 1, color = "black", lw = 2)

png

stock_change = stocks.apply(lambda x: np.log(x) - np.log(x.shift(1)))
stock_change.plot(grid=True).axhline(y = 0, color = "black", lw = 2)

png

Classical Risk Metrics

From what we have so far we can already compute informative metrics for our stocks, which can be considered some measure of risk.

First, we will want to annualize our returns, thus computing the annual percentage rate (APR). This helps us keep returns on a common time scale.

stock_change_apr = stock_change * 252 * 100    # There are 252 trading days in a year; the 100 converts to percentages
stock_change_apr.tail()

	AAPL	GOOG	MSFT	SPY
Date
2018-03-21	-577.463148	-157.285338	-176.499833	NaN
2018-03-22	-359.355133	-984.592233	-743.873619	NaN
2018-03-23	-589.663945	-669.637836	-743.366326	NaN
2018-03-26	1168.762361	768.649993	1839.012005	NaN
2018-03-27	-654.582257	-1178.241231	-1185.615651	NaN

Some of these numbers look initially like nonsense, but that’s okay for now.

The metrics I want are:

• The average return

• Volatility (the standard deviation of returns)

• and
• The Sharpe ratio

The first two metrics are largely self-explanatory, but the latter two need explaining.

First, the risk-free rate, which I denote by , is the rate of return on a risk-free financial asset. This asset exists only in theory but often yields on low-risk instruments like 3-month U.S. Treasury Bills can be viewed as being virtually risk-free and thus their yields can be used to approximate the risk-free rate. I get the data for these instruments below.

tbill = quandl.get("FRED/TB3MS", start_date=start, end_date=end)
tbill.tail()

	Value
Date
2018-02-01	1.57
2018-03-01	1.70
2018-04-01	1.76
2018-05-01	1.86
2018-06-01	1.90

tbill.plot()

png

rrf = tbill.iloc[-1, 0]    # Get the most recent Treasury Bill rate
rrf

1.8999999999999999

Now, a linear regression model is a model of the following form:

y_i = \alpha + \beta x_i + \epsilon_i

is an error process. Another way to think of this process model is:

\hat{y}_i = \alpha + \beta x_i

is the predicted value of given . In other words, a linear regression model tells you how and are related, and how values of can be used to predict values of . is the intercept of the model and is the slope. In particular, would be the predicted value of if were zero, and gives how much changes when changes by one unit.

There is an easy way to compute and given the sample means and and sample standard deviations and and the correlation between and $y$, denoted with :

In finance, we use and like so:

R_t - r_{RF} = \alpha + \beta (R_{Mt} - r_{RF}) + \epsilon_t

is the return of a financial asset (a stock) and is the excess return, or return exceeding the risk-free rate of return. is the return of the market at time . Then and can be interpreted like so:

• is average excess return over the market.
• is how much a stock moves in relation to the market. If then the stock generally moves in the same direction as the market, while when the stock moves strongly in response to the market the stock is less responsive to the market.

Below I get a pandas Series that contains how much each stock is correlated with SPY (our approximation of the market).

smcorr = stock_change_apr.drop("SPY", 1).corrwith(stock_change_apr.SPY)    # Since RRF is constant it doesn't change the
                                                                         # correlation so we can ignore it in our
                                                                 # calculation
smcorr

AAPL    0.547184
GOOG    0.592740
MSFT    0.671356
dtype: float64

Then I compute and .

sy = stock_change_apr.drop("SPY", 1).std()
sx = stock_change_apr.SPY.std()
sy

AAPL    339.921782
GOOG    312.319468
MSFT    329.308164
dtype: float64

sx    # Standard deviation for x

164.60477271861888

ybar = stock_change_apr.drop("SPY", 1).mean() - rrf
xbar = stock_change_apr.SPY.mean() - rrf
ybar

AAPL    19.769035
GOOG    11.766893
MSFT    22.362806
dtype: float64

xbar

14.962934571070926

beta = smcorr * sy / sx
alpha = ybar - beta * xbar
beta

AAPL    1.129978
GOOG    1.124658
MSFT    1.343114
dtype: float64

alpha

AAPL    2.861252
GOOG   -5.061295
MSFT    2.265881
dtype: float64

The Sharpe ratio is another popular risk metric, defined below:

\text{Sharpe ratio} = \frac{\bar{R_t} - r_{RF}}{s}

Here is the volatility of the stock. We want the sharpe ratio to be large. A large Sharpe ratio indicates that the stock's excess returns are large relative to the stock's volatilitly. Additionally, the Sharpe ratio is tied to a statistical test (the -test) to determine if a stock earns more on average than the risk-free rate; the larger this ratio, the more likely this is to be the case.

Your challenge now is to compute the Sharpe ratio for each stock listed here, and interpret it. Which stock seems to be the better investment according to the Sharpe ratio?

sharpe = (ybar - rrf)/sy
sharpe

AAPL    0.052568
GOOG    0.031592
MSFT    0.062139
dtype: float64

(xbar - rrf)/sx

0.079359391318507888

Moving Averages

Charts are very useful. In fact, some traders base their strategies almost entirely off charts (these are the "technicians", since trading strategies based off finding patterns in charts is a part of the trading doctrine known as technical analysis). Let's now consider how we can find trends in stocks.

A -day moving average is, for a series and a point in time , the average of the past days: that is, if denotes a moving average process, then:

MA^q_t = \frac{1}{q} \sum_{i = 0}^{q-1} x_{t - i}

Moving averages smooth a series and helps identify trends. The larger is, the less responsive a moving average process is to short-term fluctuations in the series . The idea is that moving average processes help identify trends from "noise". Fast moving averages have smaller and more closely follow the stock, while slow moving averages have larger , resulting in them responding less to the fluctuations of the stock and being more stable.

pandas provides functionality for easily computing moving averages. I demonstrate its use by creating a 20-day (one month) moving average for the Apple data, and plotting it alongside the stock.

apple["20d"] = np.round(apple["Adj. Close"].rolling(window = 20, center = False).mean(), 2)
pandas_candlestick_ohlc(apple.loc['2016-01-04':'2016-12-31',:], otherseries = "20d", adj=True)

png

Notice how late the rolling average begins. It cannot be computed until 20 days have passed. This limitation becomes more severe for longer moving averages. Because I would like to be able to compute 200-day moving averages, I'm going to extend out how much AAPL data we have. That said, we will still largely focus on 2016.

start = datetime.datetime(2010,1,1)
apple = quandl.get("WIKI/AAPL", start_date=start, end_date=end)
apple["20d"] = np.round(apple["Adj. Close"].rolling(window = 20, center = False).mean(), 2)

pandas_candlestick_ohlc(apple.loc['2016-01-04':'2016-12-31',:], otherseries = "20d", adj=True)

You will notice that a moving average is much smoother than the actua stock data. Additionally, it’s a stubborn indicator; a stock needs to be above or below the moving average line in order for the line to change direction. Thus, crossing a moving average signals a possible change in trend, and should draw attention.

Traders are usually interested in multiple moving averages, such as the 20-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving averages. It’s easy to examine multiple moving averages at once.

apple["50d"] = np.round(apple["Adj. Close"].rolling(window = 50, center = False).mean(), 2)
apple["200d"] = np.round(apple["Adj. Close"].rolling(window = 200, center = False).mean(), 2)

pandas_candlestick_ohlc(apple.loc['2016-01-04':'2016-12-31',:], otherseries = ["20d", "50d", "200d"], adj=True)

png

The 20-day moving average is the most sensitive to local changes, and the 200-day moving average the least. Here, the 200-day moving average indicates an overall bearish trend: the stock is trending downward over time. The 20-day moving average is at times bearish and at other times bullish, where a positive swing is expected. You can also see that the crossing of moving average lines indicate changes in trend. These crossings are what we can use as trading signals, or indications that a financial security is changind direction and a profitable trade might be made.

Trading Strategy

Our concern now is to design and evaluate trading strategies.

Any trader must have a set of rules that determine how much of her money she is willing to bet on any single trade. For example, a trader may decide that under no circumstances will she risk more than 10% of her portfolio on a trade. Additionally, in any trade, a trader must have an exit strategy, a set of conditions determining when she will exit the position, for either profit or loss. A trader may set a target, which is the minimum profit that will induce the trader to leave the position. Likewise, a trader may have a maximum loss she is willing to tolerate; if potential losses go beyond this amount, the trader will exit the position in order to prevent any further loss. We will suppose that the amount of money in the portfolio involved in any particular trade is a fixed proportion; 10% seems like a good number.

Here, I will be demonstrating a moving average crossover strategy. We will use two moving averages, one we consider “fast”, and the other “slow”. The strategy is:

• Trade the asset when the fast moving average crosses over the slow moving average.

• Exit the trade when the fast moving average crosses over the slow moving average again.

A trade will be prompted when the fast moving average crosses from below to above the slow moving average, and the trade will be exited when the fast moving average crosses below the slow moving average later.

We now have a complete strategy. But before we decide we want to use it, we should try to evaluate the quality of the strategy first. The usual means for doing so is backtesting, which is looking at how profitable the strategy is on historical data. For example, looking at the above chart’s performance on Apple stock, if the 20-day moving average is the fast moving average and the 50-day moving average the slow, this strategy does not appear to be very profitable, at least not if you are always taking long positions.

Let’s see if we can automate the backtesting task. We first identify when the 20-day average is below the 50-day average, and vice versa.

apple['20d-50d'] = apple['20d'] - apple['50d']
apple.tail()

	Open	High	Low	Close	Volume
Date
2018-03-21	175.04	175.09	171.26	171.270	35247358.0
2018-03-22	170.00	172.68	168.60	168.845	41051076.0
2018-03-23	168.39	169.92	164.94	164.940	40248954.0
2018-03-26	168.07	173.10	166.44	172.770	36272617.0
2018-03-27	173.68	175.15	166.92	168.340	38962839.0

Ex-Dividend	Split Ratio	Adj. Open	Adj. High	Adj. Low	Adj. Close
0.0	1.0	175.04	175.09	171.26	171.270
0.0	1.0	170.00	172.68	168.60	168.845
0.0	1.0	168.39	169.92	164.94	164.940
0.0	1.0	168.07	173.10	166.44	172.770
0.0	1.0	173.68	175.15	166.92	168.340

Adj. Volume	20d	50d	200d	20d-50d
35247358.0	176.94	172.57	162.68	4.37
41051076.0	176.76	172.46	162.75	4.30
40248954.0	176.23	172.27	162.81	3.96
36272617.0	175.92	172.22	162.91	3.70
38962839.0	175.41	172.05	162.98	3.36

We will refer to the sign of this difference as the regime; that is, if the fast moving average is above the slow moving average, this is a bullish regime (the bulls rule), and a bearish regime (the bears rule) holds when the fast moving average is below the slow moving average. I identify regimes with the following code.

# np.where() is a vectorized if-else function, where a condition is checked for each component of a vector, and the first argument passed is used when the condition holds, and the other passed if it does not
apple["Regime"] = np.where(apple['20d-50d'] > 0, 1, 0)
# We have 1's for bullish regimes and 0's for everything else. Below I replace bearish regimes's values with -1, and to maintain the rest of the vector, the second argument is apple["Regime"]
apple["Regime"] = np.where(apple['20d-50d'] < 0, -1, apple["Regime"])
apple.loc['2016-01-04':'2016-12-31',"Regime"].plot(ylim = (-2,2)).axhline(y = 0, color = "black", lw = 2)

png

apple["Regime"].plot(ylim = (-2,2)).axhline(y = 0, color = "black", lw = 2)

png

apple["Regime"].value_counts()

 1    1323
-1     694
 0      53
Name: Regime, dtype: int64

The last line above indicates that for 1005 days the market was bearish on Apple, while for 600 days the market was bullish, and it was neutral for 54 days.

Trading signals appear at regime changes. When a bullish regime begins, a buy signal is triggered, and when it ends, a sell signal is triggered. Likewise, when a bearish regime begins, a sell signal is triggered, and when the regime ends, a buy signal is triggered (this is of interest only if you ever will short the stock, or use some derivative like a stock option to bet against the market).

It's simple to obtain signals. Let indicate the regime at time , and the signal at time . Then:

s_t = \text{sign}(r_t - r_{t - 1})

, with indicating "sell", indicating "buy", and no action. We can obtain signals like so:

# To ensure that all trades close out, I temporarily change the regime of the last row to 0
regime_orig = apple.loc[:, "Regime"].iloc[-1]
apple.loc[:, "Regime"].iloc[-1] = 0
apple["Signal"] = np.sign(apple["Regime"] - apple["Regime"].shift(1))
# Restore original regime data
apple.loc[:, "Regime"].iloc[-1] = regime_orig
apple.tail()

/home/curtis/anaconda3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pandas/core/indexing.py:194: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame

See the caveats in the documentation: http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/indexing.html#indexing-view-versus-copy
      self._setitem_with_indexer(indexer, value)

	Open	High	Low	Close	Volume
Date
2018-03-21	175.04	175.09	171.26	171.270	35247358.0
2018-03-22	170.00	172.68	168.60	168.845	41051076.0
2018-03-23	168.39	169.92	164.94	164.940	40248954.0
2018-03-26	168.07	173.10	166.44	172.770	36272617.0
2018-03-27	173.68	175.15	166.92	168.340	38962839.0

Ex-Dividend	Split Ratio	Adj. Open	Adj. High	Adj. Low	Adj. Close
0.0	1.0	175.04	175.09	171.26	171.270
0.0	1.0	170.00	172.68	168.60	168.845
0.0	1.0	168.39	169.92	164.94	164.940
0.0	1.0	168.07	173.10	166.44	172.770
0.0	1.0	173.68	175.15	166.92	168.340

Adj. Volume	20d	50d	200d	20d-50d	Regime	Signal
35247358.0	176.94	172.57	162.68	4.37	1	0.0
41051076.0	176.76	172.46	162.75	4.30	1	0.0
40248954.0	176.23	172.27	162.81	3.96	1	0.0
36272617.0	175.92	172.22	162.91	3.70	1	0.0
38962839.0	175.41	172.05	162.98	3.36	1	-1.0

apple["Signal"].plot(ylim = (-2, 2))

png

apple["Signal"].value_counts()

 0.0    2014
-1.0      28
 1.0      27
Name: Signal, dtype: int64

We would buy Apple stock 23 times and sell Apple stock 23 times. If we only go long on Apple stock, only 23 trades will be engaged in over the 6-year period, while if we pivot from a long to a short position every time a long position is terminated, we would engage in 23 trades total. (Bear in mind that trading more frequently isn’t necessarily good; trades are never free.)

You may notice that the system as it currently stands isn’t very robust, since even a fleeting moment when the fast moving average is above the slow moving average triggers a trade, resulting in trades that end immediately (which is bad if not simply because realistically every trade is accompanied by a fee that can quickly erode earnings). Additionally, every bullish regime immediately transitions into a bearish regime, and if you were constructing trading systems that allow both bullish and bearish bets, this would lead to the end of one trade immediately triggering a new trade that bets on the market in the opposite direction, which again seems finnicky. A better system would require more evidence that the market is moving in some particular direction. But we will not concern ourselves with these details for now.

Let’s now try to identify what the prices of the stock is at every buy and every sell.

apple.loc[apple["Signal"] == 1, "Close"]

Date
2010-03-16    224.450
2010-06-18    274.074
2010-08-16    247.640
2010-09-20    283.230
2011-05-12    346.570
2011-07-14    357.770
2011-12-28    402.640
2012-06-25    570.765
2013-05-17    433.260
2013-07-31    452.530
2013-10-16    501.114
2014-03-11    536.090
2014-03-12    536.610
2014-03-24    539.190
2014-04-25    571.940
2014-10-28    106.740
2015-02-05    119.940
2015-04-28    130.560
2015-10-27    114.550
2016-03-10    101.170
2016-06-23     96.100
2016-06-30     95.600
2016-07-25     97.340
2016-12-21    117.060
2017-08-02    157.140
2017-11-01    166.890
2018-03-08    176.940
Name: Close, dtype: float64

apple.loc[apple["Signal"] == -1, "Close"]

Date
2010-06-11    253.5100
2010-07-22    259.0240
2010-08-17    251.9700
2011-03-30    348.6300
2011-03-31    348.5075
2011-05-27    337.4100
2011-11-17    377.4100
2012-05-09    569.1800
2012-10-17    644.6136
2013-06-26    398.0700
2013-10-04    483.0300
2014-01-28    506.5000
2014-03-17    526.7400
2014-04-22    531.6990
2014-10-17     97.6700
2015-01-05    106.2500
2015-04-16    126.1700
2015-06-25    127.5000
2015-06-26    126.7500
2015-12-18    106.0300
2016-05-05     93.2400
2016-06-27     92.0400
2016-07-11     96.9800
2016-11-15    107.1100
2017-06-27    143.7400
2017-10-03    154.4800
2018-02-06    163.0300
2018-03-27    168.3400
Name: Close, dtype: float64

# Create a DataFrame with trades, including the price at the trade and the regime under which the trade is made.
apple_signals = pd.concat([
        pd.DataFrame({"Price": apple.loc[apple["Signal"] == 1, "Adj. Close"],
                     "Regime": apple.loc[apple["Signal"] == 1, "Regime"],
                     "Signal": "Buy"}),
        pd.DataFrame({"Price": apple.loc[apple["Signal"] == -1, "Adj. Close"],
                     "Regime": apple.loc[apple["Signal"] == -1, "Regime"],
                     "Signal": "Sell"}),
    ])
apple_signals.sort_index(inplace = True)
apple_signals

	Price	Regime	Signal
Date
2010-03-16	28.844953	1	Buy
2010-06-11	32.579568	-1	Sell
2010-06-18	35.222329	1	Buy
2010-07-22	33.288194	-1	Sell
2010-08-16	31.825192	0	Buy
2010-08-17	32.381657	-1	Sell
2010-09-20	36.399003	1	Buy
2011-03-30	44.803814	0	Sell
2011-03-31	44.788071	-1	Sell
2011-05-12	44.539075	1	Buy
2011-05-27	43.361888	-1	Sell
2011-07-14	45.978431	1	Buy
2011-11-17	48.502445	-1	Sell
2011-12-28	51.744852	1	Buy
2012-05-09	73.147563	-1	Sell
2012-06-25	73.351258	1	Buy
2012-10-17	83.195498	-1	Sell
2013-05-17	56.878472	1	Buy
2013-06-26	52.258721	-1	Sell
2013-07-31	59.408242	1	Buy
2013-10-04	63.831819	-1	Sell
2013-10-16	66.221597	1	Buy
2014-01-28	67.325247	-1	Sell
2014-03-11	71.682490	0	Buy
2014-03-12	71.752021	1	Buy
2014-03-17	70.432269	-1	Sell
2014-03-24	72.097002	1	Buy
2014-04-22	71.095354	-1	Sell
2014-04-25	76.476120	1	Buy
2014-10-17	92.387441	-1	Sell
2014-10-28	100.966883	1	Buy
2015-01-05	100.937944	-1	Sell
2015-02-05	114.390004	1	Buy
2015-04-16	120.331722	-1	Sell
2015-04-28	124.518583	1	Buy
2015-06-25	122.104986	0	Sell
2015-06-26	121.386721	-1	Sell
2015-10-27	110.198438	1	Buy
2015-12-18	102.440744	-1	Sell
2016-03-10	98.271427	1	Buy
2016-05-05	91.122295	-1	Sell
2016-06-23	93.917337	1	Buy
2016-06-27	89.949550	-1	Sell
2016-06-30	93.428693	1	Buy
2016-07-11	94.777350	-1	Sell
2016-07-25	95.129174	1	Buy
2016-11-15	105.787035	-1	Sell
2016-12-21	115.614138	1	Buy
2017-06-27	143.159139	-1	Sell
2017-08-02	156.504989	1	Buy
2017-10-03	154.480000	-1	Sell
2017-11-01	166.890000	1	Buy
2018-02-06	163.030000	-1	Sell
2018-03-08	176.940000	1	Buy
2018-03-27	168.340000	1	Sell

# Let's see the profitability of long trades
apple_long_profits = pd.DataFrame({
        "Price": apple_signals.loc[(apple_signals["Signal"] == "Buy") &
                                  apple_signals["Regime"] == 1, "Price"],
        "Profit": pd.Series(apple_signals["Price"] - apple_signals["Price"].shift(1)).loc[
            apple_signals.loc[(apple_signals["Signal"].shift(1) == "Buy") & (apple_signals["Regime"].shift(1) == 1)].index
        ].tolist(),
        "End Date": apple_signals["Price"].loc[
            apple_signals.loc[(apple_signals["Signal"].shift(1) == "Buy") & (apple_signals["Regime"].shift(1) == 1)].index
        ].index
    })
apple_long_profits

	End Date	Price	Profit
Date
2010-03-16	2010-06-11	28.844953	3.734615
2010-06-18	2010-07-22	35.222329	-1.934135
2010-09-20	2011-03-30	36.399003	8.404812
2011-05-12	2011-05-27	44.539075	-1.177188
2011-07-14	2011-11-17	45.978431	2.524014
2011-12-28	2012-05-09	51.744852	21.402711
2012-06-25	2012-10-17	73.351258	9.844240
2013-05-17	2013-06-26	56.878472	-4.619751
2013-07-31	2013-10-04	59.408242	4.423577
2013-10-16	2014-01-28	66.221597	1.103650
2014-03-12	2014-03-17	71.752021	-1.319753
2014-03-24	2014-04-22	72.097002	-1.001648
2014-04-25	2014-10-17	76.476120	15.911321
2014-10-28	2015-01-05	100.966883	-0.028939
2015-02-05	2015-04-16	114.390004	5.941719
2015-04-28	2015-06-25	124.518583	-2.413598
2015-10-27	2015-12-18	110.198438	-7.757693
2016-03-10	2016-05-05	98.271427	-7.149132
2016-06-23	2016-06-27	93.917337	-3.967788
2016-06-30	2016-07-11	93.428693	1.348657
2016-07-25	2016-11-15	95.129174	10.657861
2016-12-21	2017-06-27	115.614138	27.545001
2017-08-02	2017-10-03	156.504989	-2.024989
2017-11-01	2018-02-06	166.890000	-3.860000
2018-03-08	2018-03-27	176.940000	-8.600000

Let’s now create a simulated portfolio of $1,000,000, and see how it would behave, according to the rules we have established. This includes:

• Investing only 10% of the portfolio in any trade

• Exiting the position if losses exceed 20% of the value of the trade.

When simulating, bear in mind that:

• Trades are done in batches of 100 stocks.

• Our stop-loss rule involves placing an order to sell the stock the moment the price drops below the specified level. Thus we need to check whether the lows during this period ever go low enough to trigger the stop-loss. Realistically, unless we buy a put option, we cannot guarantee that we will sell the stock at the price we set at the stop-loss, but we will use this as the selling price anyway for the sake of simplicity.

• Every trade is accompanied by a commission to the broker, which should be accounted for. I do not do so here.

Here’s how a backtest may look:

# We need to get the low of the price during each trade.
tradeperiods = pd.DataFrame({"Start": apple_long_profits.index,
                            "End": apple_long_profits["End Date"]})
apple_long_profits["Low"] = tradeperiods.apply(lambda x: min(apple.loc[x["Start"]:x["End"], "Adj. Low"]), axis = 1)
apple_long_profits

	End Date	Price	Profit	Low
Date
2010-03-16	2010-06-11	28.844953	3.734615	25.606402
2010-06-18	2010-07-22	35.222329	-1.934135	30.791939
2010-09-20	2011-03-30	36.399003	8.404812	35.341333
2011-05-12	2011-05-27	44.539075	-1.177188	42.335061
2011-07-14	2011-11-17	45.978431	2.524014	45.367990
2011-12-28	2012-05-09	51.744852	21.402711	51.471117
2012-06-25	2012-10-17	73.351258	9.844240	72.688768
2013-05-17	2013-06-26	56.878472	-4.619751	51.942335
2013-07-31	2013-10-04	59.408242	4.423577	59.001273
2013-10-16	2014-01-28	66.221597	1.103650	65.972629
2014-03-12	2014-03-17	71.752021	-1.319753	69.932180
2014-03-24	2014-04-22	72.097002	-1.001648	68.371743
2014-04-25	2014-10-17	76.476120	15.911321	75.409086
2014-10-28	2015-01-05	100.966883	-0.028939	99.652062
2015-02-05	2015-04-16	114.390004	5.941719	112.949876
2015-04-28	2015-06-25	124.518583	-2.413598	117.651750
2015-10-27	2015-12-18	110.198438	-7.757693	102.228192
2016-03-10	2016-05-05	98.271427	-7.149132	89.752692
2016-06-23	2016-06-27	93.917337	-3.967788	89.421814
2016-06-30	2016-07-11	93.428693	1.348657	92.158220
2016-07-25	2016-11-15	95.129174	10.657861	94.230069
2016-12-21	2017-06-27	115.614138	27.545001	113.342546
2017-08-02	2017-10-03	156.504989	-2.024989	149.160000
2017-11-01	2018-02-06	166.890000	-3.860000	154.000000
2018-03-08	2018-03-27	176.940000	-8.600000	164.940000

# Now we have all the information needed to simulate this strategy in apple_adj_long_profits
cash = 1000000
apple_backtest = pd.DataFrame({"Start Port. Value": [],
                         "End Port. Value": [],
                         "End Date": [],
                         "Shares": [],
                         "Share Price": [],
                         "Trade Value": [],
                         "Profit per Share": [],
                         "Total Profit": [],
                         "Stop-Loss Triggered": []})
port_value = .1  # Max proportion of portfolio bet on any trade
batch = 100      # Number of shares bought per batch
stoploss = .2    # % of trade loss that would trigger a stoploss
for index, row in apple_long_profits.iterrows():
    batches = np.floor(cash * port_value) // np.ceil(batch * row["Price"]) # Maximum number of batches of stocks invested in
    trade_val = batches * batch * row["Price"] # How much money is put on the line with each trade
    if row["Low"] < (1 - stoploss) * row["Price"]:   # Account for the stop-loss
        share_profit = np.round((1 - stoploss) * row["Price"], 2)
        stop_trig = True
    else:
        share_profit = row["Profit"]
        stop_trig = False
    profit = share_profit * batches * batch # Compute profits
    # Add a row to the backtest data frame containing the results of the trade
    apple_backtest = apple_backtest.append(pd.DataFrame({
                "Start Port. Value": cash,
                "End Port. Value": cash + profit,
                "End Date": row["End Date"],
                "Shares": batch * batches,
                "Share Price": row["Price"],
                "Trade Value": trade_val,
                "Profit per Share": share_profit,
                "Total Profit": profit,
                "Stop-Loss Triggered": stop_trig
            }, index = [index]))
    cash = max(0, cash + profit)

apple_backtest

	End Date	End Port. Value	Profit per Share	Share Price	Shares
2010-03-16	2010-06-11	1.012698e+06	3.734615	28.844953	3400.0
2010-06-18	2010-07-22	1.007282e+06	-1.934135	35.222329	2800.0
2010-09-20	2011-03-30	1.029975e+06	8.404812	36.399003	2700.0
2011-05-12	2011-05-27	1.027268e+06	-1.177188	44.539075	2300.0
2011-07-14	2011-11-17	1.032820e+06	2.524014	45.978431	2200.0
2011-12-28	2012-05-09	1.073486e+06	21.402711	51.744852	1900.0
2012-06-25	2012-10-17	1.087267e+06	9.844240	73.351258	1400.0
2013-05-17	2013-06-26	1.078490e+06	-4.619751	56.878472	1900.0
2013-07-31	2013-10-04	1.086452e+06	4.423577	59.408242	1800.0
2013-10-16	2014-01-28	1.088218e+06	1.103650	66.221597	1600.0
2014-03-12	2014-03-17	1.086239e+06	-1.319753	71.752021	1500.0
2014-03-24	2014-04-22	1.084736e+06	-1.001648	72.097002	1500.0
2014-04-25	2014-10-17	1.107012e+06	15.911321	76.476120	1400.0
2014-10-28	2015-01-05	1.106983e+06	-0.028939	100.966883	1000.0
2015-02-05	2015-04-16	1.112331e+06	5.941719	114.390004	900.0
2015-04-28	2015-06-25	1.110400e+06	-2.413598	124.518583	800.0
2015-10-27	2015-12-18	1.102642e+06	-7.757693	110.198438	1000.0
2016-03-10	2016-05-05	1.094778e+06	-7.149132	98.271427	1100.0
2016-06-23	2016-06-27	1.090413e+06	-3.967788	93.917337	1100.0
2016-06-30	2016-07-11	1.091897e+06	1.348657	93.428693	1100.0
2016-07-25	2016-11-15	1.103621e+06	10.657861	95.129174	1100.0
2016-12-21	2017-06-27	1.128411e+06	27.545001	115.614138	900.0
2017-08-02	2017-10-03	1.126994e+06	-2.024989	156.504989	700.0
2017-11-01	2018-02-06	1.124678e+06	-3.860000	166.890000	600.0
2018-03-08	2018-03-27	1.119518e+06	-8.600000	176.940000	600.0

Start Port. Value	Stop-Loss Triggered	Total Profit	Trade Value
1.000000e+06	0.0	12697.691096	98072.841239
1.012698e+06	0.0	-5415.577333	98622.521053
1.007282e+06	0.0	22692.991110	98277.306914
1.029975e+06	0.0	-2707.531638	102439.873355
1.027268e+06	0.0	5552.830218	101152.549241
1.032820e+06	0.0	40665.151235	98315.218526
1.073486e+06	0.0	13781.935982	102691.760672
1.087267e+06	0.0	-8777.527400	108069.096937
1.078490e+06	0.0	7962.438409	106934.835757
1.086452e+06	0.0	1765.839598	105954.555657
1.088218e+06	0.0	-1979.628917	107628.031714
1.086239e+06	0.0	-1502.472160	108145.503103
1.084736e+06	0.0	22275.849051	107066.568572
1.107012e+06	0.0	-28.938709	100966.883069
1.106983e+06	0.0	5347.546691	102951.003221
1.112331e+06	0.0	-1930.878038	99614.866549
1.110400e+06	0.0	-7757.693367	110198.437846
1.102642e+06	0.0	-7864.045388	108098.569555
1.094778e+06	0.0	-4364.566368	103309.070918
1.090413e+06	0.0	1483.522558	102771.562745
1.091897e+06	0.0	11723.647322	104642.091188
1.103621e+06	0.0	24790.501098	104052.724175
1.128411e+06	0.0	-1417.492367	109553.492367
1.126994e+06	0.0	-2316.000000	100134.000000
1.124678e+06	0.0	-5160.000000	106164.000000

apple_backtest["End Port. Value"].plot()

png

Our portfolio’s value grew by 13% in about six years. Considering that only 10% of the portfolio was ever involved in any single trade, this is not bad performance.

Notice that this strategy never lead to our rule of never allowing losses to exceed 20% of the trade’s value being invoked. For the sake of simplicity, we will ignore this rule in backtesting.

A more realistic portfolio would not be betting 10% of its value on only one stock. A more realistic one would consider investing in multiple stocks. Multiple trades may be ongoing at any given time involving multiple companies, and most of the portfolio will be in stocks, not cash. Now that we will be investing in multiple stops and exiting only when moving averages cross (not because of a stop-loss), we will need to change our approach to backtesting. For example, we will be using one pandas DataFrame to contain all buy and sell orders for all stocks being considered, and our loop above will have to track more information.

I have written functions for creating order data for multiple stocks, and a function for performing the backtesting.

def ma_crossover_orders(stocks, fast, slow):
    """
    :param stocks: A list of tuples, the first argument in each tuple being a string containing the ticker symbol of each stock (or however you want the stock represented, so long as it's unique), and the second being a pandas DataFrame containing the stocks, with a "Close" column and indexing by date (like the data frames returned by the Yahoo! Finance API)
    :param fast: Integer for the number of days used in the fast moving average
    :param slow: Integer for the number of days used in the slow moving average

    :return: pandas DataFrame containing stock orders

    This function takes a list of stocks and determines when each stock would be bought or sold depending on a moving average crossover strategy, returning a data frame with information about when the stocks in the portfolio are bought or sold according to the strategy
    """
    fast_str = str(fast) + 'd'
    slow_str = str(slow) + 'd'
    ma_diff_str = fast_str + '-' + slow_str

    trades = pd.DataFrame({"Price": [], "Regime": [], "Signal": []})
    for s in stocks:
        # Get the moving averages, both fast and slow, along with the difference in the moving averages
        s[1][fast_str] = np.round(s[1]["Close"].rolling(window = fast, center = False).mean(), 2)
        s[1][slow_str] = np.round(s[1]["Close"].rolling(window = slow, center = False).mean(), 2)
        s[1][ma_diff_str] = s[1][fast_str] - s[1][slow_str]

        # np.where() is a vectorized if-else function, where a condition is checked for each component of a vector, and the first argument passed is used when the condition holds, and the other passed if it does not
        s[1]["Regime"] = np.where(s[1][ma_diff_str] > 0, 1, 0)
        # We have 1's for bullish regimes and 0's for everything else. Below I replace bearish regimes's values with -1, and to maintain the rest of the vector, the second argument is apple["Regime"]
        s[1]["Regime"] = np.where(s[1][ma_diff_str] < 0, -1, s[1]["Regime"])
        # To ensure that all trades close out, I temporarily change the regime of the last row to 0
        regime_orig = s[1].loc[:, "Regime"].iloc[-1]
        s[1].loc[:, "Regime"].iloc[-1] = 0
        s[1]["Signal"] = np.sign(s[1]["Regime"] - s[1]["Regime"].shift(1))
        # Restore original regime data
        s[1].loc[:, "Regime"].iloc[-1] = regime_orig

        # Get signals
        signals = pd.concat([
            pd.DataFrame({"Price": s[1].loc[s[1]["Signal"] == 1, "Adj. Close"],
                         "Regime": s[1].loc[s[1]["Signal"] == 1, "Regime"],
                         "Signal": "Buy"}),
            pd.DataFrame({"Price": s[1].loc[s[1]["Signal"] == -1, "Adj. Close"],
                         "Regime": s[1].loc[s[1]["Signal"] == -1, "Regime"],
                         "Signal": "Sell"}),
        ])
        signals.index = pd.MultiIndex.from_product([signals.index, [s[0]]], names = ["Date", "Symbol"])
        trades = trades.append(signals)

    trades.sort_index(inplace = True)
    trades.index = pd.MultiIndex.from_tuples(trades.index, names = ["Date", "Symbol"])

    return trades


def backtest(signals, cash, port_value = .1, batch = 100):
    """
    :param signals: pandas DataFrame containing buy and sell signals with stock prices and symbols, like that returned by ma_crossover_orders
    :param cash: integer for starting cash value
    :param port_value: maximum proportion of portfolio to risk on any single trade
    :param batch: Trading batch sizes

    :return: pandas DataFrame with backtesting results

    This function backtests strategies, with the signals generated by the strategies being passed in the signals DataFrame. A fictitious portfolio is simulated and the returns generated by this portfolio are reported.
    """

    SYMBOL = 1 # Constant for which element in index represents symbol
    portfolio = dict()    # Will contain how many stocks are in the portfolio for a given symbol
    port_prices = dict()  # Tracks old trade prices for determining profits
    # Dataframe that will contain backtesting report
    results = pd.DataFrame({"Start Cash": [],
                            "End Cash": [],
                            "Portfolio Value": [],
                            "Type": [],
                            "Shares": [],
                            "Share Price": [],
                            "Trade Value": [],
                            "Profit per Share": [],
                            "Total Profit": []})

    for index, row in signals.iterrows():
        # These first few lines are done for any trade
        shares = portfolio.setdefault(index[SYMBOL], 0)
        trade_val = 0
        batches = 0
        cash_change = row["Price"] * shares   # Shares could potentially be a positive or negative number (cash_change will be added in the end; negative shares indicate a short)
        portfolio[index[SYMBOL]] = 0  # For a given symbol, a position is effectively cleared

        old_price = port_prices.setdefault(index[SYMBOL], row["Price"])
        portfolio_val = 0
        for key, val in portfolio.items():
            portfolio_val += val * port_prices[key]

        if row["Signal"] == "Buy" and row["Regime"] == 1:  # Entering a long position
            batches = np.floor((portfolio_val + cash) * port_value) // np.ceil(batch * row["Price"]) # Maximum number of batches of stocks invested in
            trade_val = batches * batch * row["Price"] # How much money is put on the line with each trade
            cash_change -= trade_val  # We are buying shares so cash will go down
            portfolio[index[SYMBOL]] = batches * batch  # Recording how many shares are currently invested in the stock
            port_prices[index[SYMBOL]] = row["Price"]   # Record price
            old_price = row["Price"]
        elif row["Signal"] == "Sell" and row["Regime"] == -1: # Entering a short
            pass
            # Do nothing; can we provide a method for shorting the market?
        #else:
            #raise ValueError("I don't know what to do with signal " + row["Signal"])

        pprofit = row["Price"] - old_price   # Compute profit per share; old_price is set in such a way that entering a position results in a profit of zero

        # Update report
        results = results.append(pd.DataFrame({
                "Start Cash": cash,
                "End Cash": cash + cash_change,
                "Portfolio Value": cash + cash_change + portfolio_val + trade_val,
                "Type": row["Signal"],
                "Shares": batch * batches,
                "Share Price": row["Price"],
                "Trade Value": abs(cash_change),
                "Profit per Share": pprofit,
                "Total Profit": batches * batch * pprofit
            }, index = [index]))
        cash += cash_change  # Final change to cash balance

    results.sort_index(inplace = True)
    results.index = pd.MultiIndex.from_tuples(results.index, names = ["Date", "Symbol"])

    return results

# Get more stocks
(microsoft, google, facebook, twitter, netflix,
amazon, yahoo, ge, qualcomm, ibm, hp) = (quandl.get("WIKI/" + s, start_date=start,
                                                                         end_date=end) for s in ["MSFT", "GOOG", "FB", "TWTR",
                                                                                                 "NFLX", "AMZN", "YHOO", "GE",
                                                                                                 "QCOM", "IBM", "HPQ"])

signals = ma_crossover_orders([("AAPL", apple),
                              ("MSFT",  microsoft),
                              ("GOOG",  google),
                              ("FB",    facebook),
                              ("TWTR",  twitter),
                              ("NFLX",  netflix),
                              ("AMZN",  amazon),
                              ("YHOO",  yahoo),
                              ("GE",    ge),
                              ("QCOM",  qualcomm),
                              ("IBM",   ibm),
                              ("HPQ",   hp)],
                            fast = 20, slow = 50)
signals

/home/curtis/anaconda3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pandas/core/indexing.py:194: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame

See the caveats in the documentation: http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/indexing.html#indexing-view-versus-copy
self._setitem_with_indexer(indexer, value)

		Price	Regime	Signal
Date	Symbol
2010-03-16	AAPL	28.844953	1.0	Buy
AMZN	131.790000	1.0	Buy
GE	14.129260	1.0	Buy
HPQ	19.921951	1.0	Buy
IBM	105.460506	1.0	Buy
MSFT	23.978839	-1.0	Sell
NFLX	10.090000	1.0	Buy
QCOM	32.235226	-1.0	Sell
YHOO	16.360000	-1.0	Sell
2010-03-17	YHOO	16.500000	1.0	Buy
2010-03-24	MSFT	24.207442	1.0	Buy
2010-04-01	QCOM	34.929069	1.0	Buy
2010-05-07	QCOM	30.161131	-1.0	Sell
2010-05-10	HPQ	18.684203	-1.0	Sell
2010-05-17	YHOO	16.270000	-1.0	Sell
2010-05-19	AMZN	124.590000	-1.0	Sell
GE	13.495907	-1.0	Sell
MSFT	23.161072	-1.0	Sell
2010-05-20	IBM	102.001194	-1.0	Sell
2010-06-11	AAPL	32.579568	-1.0	Sell
2010-06-18	AAPL	35.222329	1.0	Buy
2010-06-29	IBM	103.064049	1.0	Buy
2010-06-30	IBM	101.737540	-1.0	Sell
2010-07-07	IBM	104.637735	1.0	Buy
2010-07-20	IBM	104.266971	-1.0	Sell
2010-07-22	AAPL	33.288194	-1.0	Sell
2010-07-27	QCOM	32.585294	1.0	Buy
2010-07-28	IBM	105.815940	1.0	Buy
2010-07-29	NFLX	14.002857	-1.0	Sell
2010-08-02	HPQ	18.129988	1.0	Buy
…	…	…	…	…
2017-11-01	AAPL	166.890000	1.0	Buy
2017-12-06	NFLX	185.300000	-1.0	Sell
2017-12-15	HPQ	20.920000	-1.0	Sell
2017-12-26	FB	175.990000	-1.0	Sell
2018-01-03	FB	184.670000	1.0	Buy
2018-01-09	NFLX	209.310000	1.0	Buy
2018-01-11	HPQ	22.410000	1.0	Buy
2018-01-18	QCOM	68.050000	-1.0	Sell
2018-01-19	QCOM	68.040000	1.0	Buy
2018-02-06	AAPL	163.030000	-1.0	Sell
2018-02-21	IBM	153.960000	-1.0	Sell
QCOM	63.400000	-1.0	Sell
2018-02-22	HPQ	21.390000	-1.0	Sell
2018-02-23	FB	183.290000	-1.0	Sell
2018-02-27	GOOG	1118.290000	-1.0	Sell
2018-03-08	AAPL	176.940000	1.0	Buy
2018-03-09	HPQ	24.650000	1.0	Buy
2018-03-14	GOOG	1149.490000	1.0	Buy
2018-03-23	GOOG	1021.570000	-1.0	Sell
2018-03-27	AAPL	168.340000	1.0	Sell
AMZN	1497.050000	1.0	Sell
FB	152.190000	-1.0	Buy
GE	13.440000	-1.0	Buy
GOOG	1005.100000	-1.0	Buy
HPQ	21.770000	1.0	Sell
IBM	151.910000	-1.0	Buy
MSFT	89.470000	1.0	Sell
NFLX	300.690000	1.0	Sell
QCOM	54.840000	-1.0	Buy
TWTR	28.070000	1.0	Sell

511 rows × 3 columns

bk = backtest(signals, 1000000)
bk

		End Cash	Portfolio Value	Profit per Share
Date	Symbol
2010-03-16	AAPL	9.019272e+05	1.000000e+06	0.000000
AMZN	8.096742e+05	1.000000e+06	0.000000
GE	7.107693e+05	1.000000e+06	0.000000
HPQ	6.111596e+05	1.000000e+06	0.000000
IBM	5.162451e+05	1.000000e+06	0.000000
MSFT	5.162451e+05	1.000000e+06	0.000000
NFLX	4.163541e+05	1.000000e+06	0.000000
QCOM	4.163541e+05	1.000000e+06	0.000000
YHOO	4.163541e+05	1.000000e+06	0.000000
2010-03-17	YHOO	3.173541e+05	1.000000e+06	0.000000
2010-03-24	MSFT	2.181036e+05	1.000000e+06	0.000000
2010-04-01	QCOM	1.203022e+05	1.000000e+06	0.000000
2010-05-07	QCOM	2.047534e+05	9.866498e+05	-4.767938
2010-05-10	HPQ	2.981744e+05	9.804610e+05	-1.237749
2010-05-17	YHOO	3.957944e+05	9.790810e+05	-0.230000
2010-05-19	AMZN	4.830074e+05	9.740410e+05	-7.200000
GE	5.774787e+05	9.696076e+05	-0.633354
MSFT	6.724391e+05	9.653174e+05	-1.046370
2010-05-20	IBM	7.642402e+05	9.622041e+05	-3.459312
2010-06-11	AAPL	8.750107e+05	9.749017e+05	3.734615
2010-06-18	AAPL	7.799105e+05	9.749017e+05	0.000000
2010-06-29	IBM	6.871528e+05	9.749017e+05	0.000000
2010-06-30	IBM	7.787166e+05	9.737079e+05	-1.326510
2010-07-07	IBM	6.845426e+05	9.737079e+05	0.000000
2010-07-20	IBM	7.783829e+05	9.733742e+05	-0.370764
2010-07-22	AAPL	8.682610e+05	9.681520e+05	-1.934135
2010-07-27	QCOM	7.737637e+05	9.681520e+05	0.000000
2010-07-28	IBM	6.785293e+05	9.681520e+05	0.000000
2010-07-29	NFLX	8.171576e+05	1.006889e+06	3.912857
2010-08-02	HPQ	7.174427e+05	1.006889e+06	0.000000
…	…	…	…	…
2017-11-01	AAPL	1.297792e+05	2.153164e+06	0.000000
2017-12-06	NFLX	3.336092e+05	2.149600e+06	-3.240000
2017-12-15	HPQ	5.700052e+05	2.170395e+06	1.840267
2017-12-26	FB	8.339902e+05	2.244450e+06	49.370000
2018-01-03	FB	6.123862e+05	2.244450e+06	0.000000
2018-01-09	NFLX	4.030762e+05	2.244450e+06	0.000000
2018-01-11	HPQ	1.789762e+05	2.244450e+06	0.000000
2018-01-18	QCOM	4.511762e+05	2.301960e+06	14.377402
2018-01-19	QCOM	2.266442e+05	2.301960e+06	0.000000
2018-02-06	AAPL	4.222802e+05	2.297328e+06	-3.860000
2018-02-21	IBM	6.378242e+05	2.309716e+06	8.848221
QCOM	8.470442e+05	2.294404e+06	-4.640000
2018-02-22	HPQ	1.060944e+06	2.284204e+06	-1.020000
2018-02-23	FB	1.280892e+06	2.282548e+06	-1.380000
2018-02-27	GOOG	1.504550e+06	2.316306e+06	168.790000
2018-03-08	AAPL	1.274528e+06	2.316306e+06	0.000000
2018-03-09	HPQ	1.045283e+06	2.316306e+06	0.000000
2018-03-14	GOOG	8.153852e+05	2.316306e+06	0.000000
2018-03-23	GOOG	1.019699e+06	2.290722e+06	-127.920000
2018-03-27	AAPL	1.238541e+06	2.279542e+06	-8.600000
AMZN	1.537951e+06	2.377684e+06	490.710000
FB	1.537951e+06	2.377684e+06	-32.480000
GE	1.537951e+06	2.377684e+06	-16.213194
GOOG	1.537951e+06	2.377684e+06	-144.390000
HPQ	1.740412e+06	2.350900e+06	-2.880000
IBM	1.740412e+06	2.350900e+06	6.798221
MSFT	2.026716e+06	2.451672e+06	31.491454
NFLX	2.327406e+06	2.543052e+06	91.380000
QCOM	2.327406e+06	2.543052e+06	-13.200000
TWTR	2.683895e+06	2.683895e+06	11.090000

Share Price	Shares	Start Cash	Total Profit	Trade Value	Type
28.844953	3400.0	1.000000e+06	0.0	98072.841239	Buy
131.790000	700.0	9.019272e+05	0.0	92253.000000	Buy
14.129260	7000.0	8.096742e+05	0.0	98904.822860	Buy
19.921951	5000.0	7.107693e+05	0.0	99609.756314	Buy
105.460506	900.0	6.111596e+05	0.0	94914.455453	Buy
23.978839	0.0	5.162451e+05	0.0	0.000000	Sell
10.090000	9900.0	5.162451e+05	0.0	99891.000000	Buy
32.235226	0.0	4.163541e+05	0.0	0.000000	Sell
16.360000	0.0	4.163541e+05	0.0	0.000000	Sell
16.500000	6000.0	4.163541e+05	0.0	99000.000000	Buy
24.207442	4100.0	3.173541e+05	0.0	99250.512998	Buy
34.929069	2800.0	2.181036e+05	0.0	97801.393965	Buy
30.161131	0.0	1.203022e+05	-0.0	84451.168198	Sell
18.684203	0.0	2.047534e+05	-0.0	93421.012620	Sell
16.270000	0.0	2.981744e+05	-0.0	97620.000000	Sell
124.590000	0.0	3.957944e+05	-0.0	87213.000000	Sell
13.495907	0.0	4.830074e+05	-0.0	94471.347126	Sell
23.161072	0.0	5.774787e+05	-0.0	94960.396545	Sell
102.001194	0.0	6.724391e+05	-0.0	91801.074363	Sell
32.579568	0.0	7.642402e+05	0.0	110770.532335	Sell
35.222329	2700.0	8.750107e+05	0.0	95100.288159	Buy
103.064049	900.0	7.799105e+05	0.0	92757.644524	Buy
101.737540	0.0	6.871528e+05	-0.0	91563.785641	Sell
104.637735	900.0	7.787166e+05	0.0	94173.961584	Buy
104.266971	0.0	6.845426e+05	-0.0	93840.274319	Sell
33.288194	0.0	7.783829e+05	-0.0	89878.124302	Sell
32.585294	2900.0	8.682610e+05	0.0	94497.352787	Buy
105.815940	900.0	7.737637e+05	0.0	95234.345561	Buy
14.002857	0.0	6.785293e+05	0.0	138628.285714	Sell
18.129988	5500.0	8.171576e+05	0.0	99714.934419	Buy
…	…	…	…	…	…
166.890000	1200.0	3.300472e+05	0.0	200268.000000	Buy
185.300000	0.0	1.297792e+05	-0.0	203830.000000	Sell
20.920000	0.0	3.336092e+05	0.0	236396.000000	Sell
175.990000	0.0	5.700052e+05	0.0	263985.000000	Sell
184.670000	1200.0	8.339902e+05	0.0	221604.000000	Buy
209.310000	1000.0	6.123862e+05	0.0	209310.000000	Buy
22.410000	10000.0	4.030762e+05	0.0	224100.000000	Buy
68.050000	0.0	1.789762e+05	0.0	272200.000000	Sell
68.040000	3300.0	4.511762e+05	0.0	224532.000000	Buy
163.030000	0.0	2.266442e+05	-0.0	195636.000000	Sell
153.960000	0.0	4.222802e+05	0.0	215544.000000	Sell
63.400000	0.0	6.378242e+05	-0.0	209220.000000	Sell
21.390000	0.0	8.470442e+05	-0.0	213900.000000	Sell
183.290000	0.0	1.060944e+06	-0.0	219948.000000	Sell
1118.290000	0.0	1.280892e+06	0.0	223658.000000	Sell
176.940000	1300.0	1.504550e+06	0.0	230022.000000	Buy
24.650000	9300.0	1.274528e+06	0.0	229245.000000	Buy
1149.490000	200.0	1.045283e+06	0.0	229898.000000	Buy
1021.570000	0.0	8.153852e+05	-0.0	204314.000000	Sell
168.340000	0.0	1.019699e+06	-0.0	218842.000000	Sell
1497.050000	0.0	1.238541e+06	0.0	299410.000000	Sell
152.190000	0.0	1.537951e+06	-0.0	0.000000	Buy
13.440000	0.0	1.537951e+06	-0.0	0.000000	Buy
1005.100000	0.0	1.537951e+06	-0.0	0.000000	Buy
21.770000	0.0	1.537951e+06	-0.0	202461.000000	Sell
151.910000	0.0	1.740412e+06	0.0	0.000000	Buy
89.470000	0.0	1.740412e+06	0.0	286304.000000	Sell
300.690000	0.0	2.026716e+06	0.0	300690.000000	Sell
54.840000	0.0	2.327406e+06	-0.0	0.000000	Buy
28.070000	0.0	2.327406e+06	0.0	356489.000000	Sell

511 rows × 9 columns

bk["Portfolio Value"].groupby(level = 0).apply(lambda x: x[-1]).plot()

png

A more realistic portfolio that can invest in any in a list of twelve (tech) stocks has a final growth of about 100%. How good is this? While on the surface not bad, we will see we could have done better.

Benchmarking

Backtesting is only part of evaluating the efficacy of a trading strategy. We would like to benchmark the strategy, or compare it to other available (usually well-known) strategies in order to determine how well we have done.

Whenever you evaluate a trading system, there is one strategy that you should always check, one that beats all but a handful of managed mutual funds and investment managers: buy and hold SPY. The efficient market hypothesis claims that it is all but impossible for anyone to beat the market. Thus, one should always buy an index fund that merely reflects the composition of the market.By buying and holding SPY, we are effectively trying to match our returns with the market rather than beat it.

I look at the profits for simply buying and holding SPY.

#spyder = web.DataReader("SPY", "yahoo", start, end)
spyder = spyderdat.loc[start:end]
spyder.iloc[[0,-1],:]

	Open	High	Low	Close	Adj Close
date
2010-01-04	112.37	113.39	111.51	113.33	113.33
2018-01-29	285.93	286.43	284.50	284.68	284.68

batches = 1000000 // np.ceil(100 * spyder.loc[:,"Adj Close"].iloc[0]) # Maximum number of batches of stocks invested in
trade_val = batches * batch * spyder.loc[:,"Adj Close"].iloc[0] # How much money is used to buy SPY
final_val = batches * batch * spyder.loc[:,"Adj Close"].iloc[-1] + (1000000 - trade_val) # Final value of the portfolio
final_val

2507880.0

# We see that the buy-and-hold strategy beats the strategy we developed earlier. I would also like to see a plot.
ax_bench = (spyder["Adj Close"] / spyder.loc[:, "Adj Close"].iloc[0]).plot(label = "SPY")
ax_bench = (bk["Portfolio Value"].groupby(level = 0).apply(lambda x: x[-1]) / 1000000).plot(ax = ax_bench, label = "Portfolio")
ax_bench.legend(ax_bench.get_lines(), [l.get_label() for l in ax_bench.get_lines()], loc = 'best')
ax_bench

png

Buying and holding SPY performs about as well as our trading system, at least how we currently set it up, and we haven’t even accounted for how expensive our more complex strategy is in terms of fees. Given both the opportunity cost and the expense associated with the active strategy, we should not use it.

What could we do to improve the performance of our system? For starters, we could try diversifying. All the stocks we considered were tech companies, which means that if the tech industry is doing poorly, our portfolio will reflect that. We could try developing a system that can also short stocks or bet bearishly, so we can take advantage of movement in any direction. We could seek means for forecasting how high we expect a stock to move. Whatever we do, though, must beat this benchmark; otherwise there is an opportunity cost associated with our trading system.

Other benchmark strategies exist, and if our trading system beat the “buy and hold SPY” strategy, we may check against them. Some such strategies include:

• Buy SPY when its closing monthly price is aboves its ten-month moving average.

• Buy SPY when its ten-month momentum is positive. (Momentum is the first difference of a moving average process, or .)

(I first read of these strategies here.) The general lesson still holds: don’t use a complex trading system with lots of active trading when a simple strategy involving an index fund without frequent trading beats it. This is actually a very difficult requirement to meet.

As a final note, suppose that your trading system did manage to beat any baseline strategy thrown at it in backtesting. Does backtesting predict future performance? Not at all. Backtesting has a propensity for overfitting, so just because backtesting predicts high growth doesn’t mean that growth will hold in the future. There are strategies for combatting overfitting, such as walk-forward analysis and holding out a portion of a dataset (likely the most recent part) as a final test set to determine if a strategy is profitable, followed by “sitting on” a strategy that managed to survive these two filters and seeing if it remains profitable in current markets.

Conclusion

While this lecture ends on a depressing note, keep in mind that the efficient market hypothesis has many critics. My own opinion is that as trading becomes more algorithmic, beating the market will become more difficult. That said, it may be possible to beat the market, even though mutual funds seem incapable of doing so (bear in mind, though, that part of the reason mutual funds perform so poorly is because of fees, which is not a concern for index funds).

This lecture is very brief, covering only one type of strategy: strategies based on moving averages. Many other trading signals exist and employed. Additionally, we never discussed in depth shorting stocks, currency trading, or stock options. Stock options, in particular, are a rich subject that offer many different ways to bet on the direction of a stock. You can read more about derivatives (including stock options and other derivatives) in the book Derivatives Analytics with Python: Data Analysis, Models, Simulation, Calibration and Hedging, which is available from the University of Utah library.

Another resource (which I used as a reference while writing this lecture) is the O’Reilly book Python for Finance, also available from the University of Utah library.

If you were interested in investigating algorithmic trading, where would you go from here? I would not recommend using the code I wrote above for backtesting; there are better packages for this task. Python has some libraries for algorithmic trading, such as pyfolio (for analytics), zipline (for backtesting and algorithmic trading), and backtrader (also for backtesting and trading). zipline seems to be popular likely because it is used and developed by quantopian, a “crowd-sourced hedge fund” that allows users to use their data for backtesting and even will license profitable strategies from their authors, giving them a cut of the profits. However, I prefer backtrader and have written blog posts on using it. It is likely the more complicated between the two but that’s the cost of greater power. I am a fan of its design. I also would suggest learning R, since it has many packages for analyzing financial data (moreso than Python) and it’s surprisingly easy to use R functions in Python (as I demonstrate in this post).

You can read more about using R and Python for finance on my blog.

Remember that it is possible (if not common) to lose money in the stock market. It’s also true, though, that it’s difficult to find returns like those found in stocks, and any investment strategy should take investing in it seriously. This lecture is intended to provide a starting point for evaluating stock trading and investments, and, more generally, analyzing temporal data, and I hope you continue to explore these ideas.

I have created a video course published by Packt Publishing entitled Training Your Systems with Python Statistical Modeling, the third volume in a four-volume set of video courses entitled, Taming Data with Python; Excelling as a Data Analyst. This course discusses how to use Python for machine learning. The course covers classical statistical methods, supervised learning including classification and regression, clustering, dimensionality reduction, and more! The course is peppered with examples demonstrating the techniques and software on real-world data and visuals to explain the concepts presented. Viewers get a hands-on experience using Python for machine learning. If you are starting out using Python for data analysis or know someone who is, please consider buying my course or at least spreading the word about it. You can buy the course directly or purchase a subscription to Mapt and watch it there.

If you like my blog and would like to support it, spread the word (if not get a copy yourself)! Also, stay tuned for future courses I publish with Packt at the Video Courses section of my site.

Thanks for visiting r-craft.org This article is originally published at https://ntguardian.wordpress.com Please visit source website for post related comments.

Reference : https://www.r-craft.org/r-news/stock-data-analysis-with-python-second-edition/